MediaPolitical's thoughts on MSNBC's post debate coverage

   By Donna Cole

 My first analysis of tonight's debate from watching the post debate coverage is that the liberals at MSNBC are beyond excuse making, or hair on fire, they are angry. Public displays of anger is one of the hallmarks of liberalism, and they are publicly showing their rear ends tonight. As a pundit, MediaPolitical is embarrassed how they are behaving.


 Rachel Maddow's mini-me Chris Hayes while interviewing Rudy Giuliani literally looked like it was all he could do to control himself from throwing something, like a girl, at Giuliani (Who was not in the studio). He had his eyes down with angry, even demented looking facial expressions, sometimes glancing up at the camera with an almost sadistic smile. Hayes looked like an evil child in a horror movie. It was really a bit unsettling. I was waiting for slobber to drip from his lip. I honestly think Chris Hayes lost it tonight. He could not contain his anger, but other liberals suck this stuff up, that being public displays of rage against their political enemies.


 Al Sharpton, MSNBC's race card playing champ, couldn't find anything racist about the debate. He couldn't even make up something. So, like the rest of this leftist crowd, he had nothing to do but sit around, be angry, and wish they could protest somewhere. Chris Matthews came up with the idea Obama couldn't win because he is the sitting president, which is absurd. That must be the same excuse he has told himself all these years about the Carter-Reagan debates. Another thing that bothered me by Matthews was he kept quoting the president, then saying, "That is TRUE!" When in fact it was not.


 These left wingers, are all upset for one reason. They live on the attack, they have no clue how to defend their policies and ideas because they don't care what people think about their policies and ideas. Liberals think they know better than the average person, and that people want to be treated like children and cuddled from the cradle to the casket. When something occurs outside of this Utopian vision, it confuses them, and this confusion leads to anger.


 In the President's '08 debates, when he didn't have to defend his leadership, hope and change worked just fine. Not this time around. This is why Obama did so poorly in the debate, he can't defend his policies because he thinks he did nothing wrong. Obama was actually taken aback that Romney would even challenge him. He was offended by this, as the liberals on MSNBC were.


 And the saddest thing from the liberal media is that they are accusing PBS's Jim Lehrer as being a right winger who favored Romney in the debate. Chris Matthews raged about how Lehrer ruined the debate for Obama, which again, like anything that comes from his mouth or tingly leg, is absurd. This, like Obama's policies and the left's excuses for him is beyond ridiculous. What happened in this debate was simple, Romney finally got a fair shake and Obama had to defend himself. He couldn't.